🔗 Share this article

The iPhone maker may have to permit rivals to run separate application platforms on iPhones in the UK, following a ruling from the competition regulator.

This would be a significant change to the company's infamous "closed system" where applications can only be downloaded from its own official marketplace.

But the Competition and Markets Authority has designated both the tech giants as having "strategic market status" - indicating they have a lot of power over mobile platforms.

Regulatory Assessment

The CMA said the tech firms "may be limiting innovation and competition".

But the regulator emphasized it did not "find or assume misconduct" from the firms.

"The app economy generates one and a half percent of the UK's GDP and sustains around four hundred thousand positions, which is why it's crucial these markets function properly for business," commented a senior official from the CMA.

Approximately ninety to one hundred percent of British smartphones run on the two tech companies' operating systems, creating what the authority calls an "effective duopoly".

Based on recent analysis, nearly half of British smartphone users use an Apple device - which runs Apple's iOS - with the vast majority of the rest using the Android OS.

Apple's Response

The regulatory probe focused on how dominant the companies' own applications are versus competitors - as well as their web applications and operating systems.

It is unknown what changes the regulator will look to request, but earlier it published guidelines outlining potential measures it could take.

These include mandating it to be easier for people to transition between iOS and Android phones, and for both firms to list applications "fairly and openly" in their marketplaces.

Apple specifically may be compelled to permit alternative app stores on its devices, and let people to download programs straight from companies' websites.

This would mirror a similar ruling in the EU, which previously took action against the company for anti-competitive behaviour.

The technology firm cautioned the United Kingdom could face delays to getting new features - as has occurred in the European Union - which the company attributes to heavy regulation.

For example, some Apple Intelligence capabilities which have been launched in other parts of the world are not available in the EU.

"We faces fierce competition in every market where we operate, and we strive continuously to create the finest offerings, services and user experience," the organization said in a release.

"Britain's implementation of European regulations would undermine that, leaving users with reduced data protection and safety, slower availability to new features, and a fragmented, less seamless experience."

Google's Position

Google device owners can presently use alternative marketplaces - though critics say they are not as user-friendly as the company's official Play Store.

The regulator's plan said the search company may have to "change the user experience" of downloading apps directly from online sources, as well as "remove user frictions" when using third-party platforms.

"We simply do not see the rationale for today's designation decision," a company competition lead stated.

The executive said "the majority" of Android users use third-party platforms or download apps directly from a creator's site, and claimed there is a far greater range of applications offered for Android users compared to those on Apple devices.

"Currently available are 24,000 Android phone models from thirteen hundred phone manufacturers globally, facing strong rivalry from Apple's platform in the United Kingdom," the spokesperson added.

Android is an freely available software, which means developers can utilize and develop on top of it for no cost.

Google argues this means it promotes competition.

But consumer groups said restrictions on these firms' dominance in other countries "currently assist enterprises to develop and providing customers more choice".

"Their dominance is now causing real harm by limiting options for consumers and market rivalry for businesses," commented a consumer advocate.