🔗 Share this article

During economic booms, there arrive points where market commentators wonder if exuberance has become excessive.

Latest multi-billion dollar deals involving OpenAI with semiconductor makers Nvidia and AMD have raised questions about the sustainability behind massive investments in AI technology.

Why the Nvidia and AMD Agreements Worrying to Financial Observers?

Some commentators express apprehension regarding the circular structure in these deals. Under the terms of the Nvidia agreement, OpenAI will pay Nvidia in cash to acquire processors, while the company will invest into OpenAI in exchange for minority stakes.

Prominent British tech backer James Anderson stated unease regarding similarities with supplier funding, where a business provides monetary support to a customer purchasing their goods – a risky situation if those customers hold overly optimistic business projections.

Supplier funding was among the hallmarks of the turn-of-the-millennium dotcom bubble.

"It is not quite like what numerous telecommunications suppliers were up to in 1999-2000, but it has some similarities to it. I'm not convinced it makes me feel completely comfortable from that perspective regarding this," commented Anderson.

Meanwhile, the Advanced Micro Devices arrangement also entangles OpenAI with another chip maker in addition to Nvidia. Under this agreement, OpenAI plans to utilize hundreds of thousands of AMD chips in their data centers – the central nervous systems of AI tools such as ChatGPT – while gaining an opportunity to buy ten percent of AMD.

All of this is fueled through the insatiable demand from OpenAI as well as its peers to secure as much processing capacity available to drive their models toward increasingly significant performance breakthroughs – as well as to satisfy expanding market needs.

Neil Wilson, UK investor analyst with financial firm Saxo, remarked that deals like the NVIDIA and OpenAI all suggested circumstances which "looks, feels and sounds similar to an economic bubble."

Which Are Additional Indicators Pointing to a Bubble?

Anderson flagged soaring valuations at prominent AI firms as another source for worry. OpenAI currently valued at $500bn (£372 billion), versus $157 billion in October last year, whereas Anthropic nearly tripled its worth lately, going from $60bn in March up to $170 billion last month.

Anderson commented how the scale of the value increases "concerned me." According to accounts, OpenAI supposedly posted revenue of $4.3 billion in the initial six months of the current year, with an operating loss totaling $7.8bn, according to tech publication The Information.

Recent share price swings have also jolted experienced financial observers. As an example, AMD briefly added $80 billion to its market cap throughout stock market trading this past Monday following the OpenAI news, whereas Oracle – one profiting due to need for AI support systems like data centers – added approximately $250 billion in a single day in September following announcing better than expected results.

There is also an enormous capital expenditure boom, which refers to spending for non-personnel expenses such as buildings as well as equipment. The major quartet AI "hyperscalers" – Facebook parent Meta, Google parent Alphabet, Microsoft together with Amazon – are expected to invest $325 billion on capex in the current year, roughly the economic output belonging to Portugal.

Does AI Adoption Justifying Investor Enthusiasm?

Confidence toward the AI boom was rattled in August when the Massachusetts Institute of Technology published a study showing how 95% of organizations receive zero return from their investments in AI generation tools. The study said the issue was not the quality of AI systems but how they were used.

The report indicated this represented a clear example of a "AI adoption gap", with startups headed by 19- or 20-year-olds reporting a jump in revenues through deploying AI technologies.

The report coincided with a substantial decline in AI support stocks including NVIDIA and Oracle. This happened 60 days following consulting firm McKinsey, the advisory group, reported that four out of five businesses report using genAI, but the same percentage indicate minimal impact upon their bottom line.

McKinsey said this occurs because AI systems are utilized for broad applications like creating conference summaries rather than targeted uses such as identifying risky vendors or producing ideas.

Everything here worries backers since a key commitment by AI companies such as Alphabet, OpenAI and Microsoft remains how if organizations purchase their products, they will enhance efficiency – a measure of economic performance – through enabling a single employee accomplish significantly greater profitable work in a typical working day.

Nevertheless, there are other clear signs pointing to broad adoption of AI. This week, OpenAI stated that ChatGPT is now used among 800 million users weekly, up from the figure at 500 million mentioned by the company last March. Sam Altman, OpenAI’s chief executive, firmly maintains how demand for paid-for services for AI is going to continue to "sharply increase."

What the Overall Situation Reveal?

Adrian Cox, an investment strategist at Deutsche Bank's research division, states the current situation feels like "we are at a crossroads when signals are flashing different colors."

Warning signs, he says, include massive capital expenditure wherein "the current generation of processors might become outdated prior to the investment yields returns" together with rapidly increasing valuations of private companies such as OpenAI.

The amber signals are a more than doubling of the share prices of the "top seven" US technology stocks. This is balanced by their price to earnings ratios – an assessment of whether an investment stands under- or overvalued – which are below historical levels