🔗 Share this article

Established parties in power are increasingly enabling the radical right to set the political agenda, according to a new research conducted in the Federal Republic of Germany.

Academics discovered that this phenomenon has unwittingly helped radical groups by legitimising their ideas and spreading them more widely.

Analysis Drawing from Two Decades of Media Reporting

The results, published in the academic journal on political studies, utilized an automated text analysis of more than 520,000 articles from six national publications.

Berlin-based researchers noted that as the radical faction moved from marginal topics in the 1990s era to core themes like integration and immigration, established political groups progressively adjusted their communication in reaction.

This adaptation boosted the spread of these ideas and signaled to voters that such stances were legitimate.

Consequences for Democratic Systems

"Political discourse by established parties plays a central role in the voting performance of the far right," explained a political sociologist participating in the study.

"This element has been overlooked," she added.

The impact was evident even when conventional groups were condemning the far right. "You're still giving them attention," the expert commented. "The main point is that because we live in such a battle for attention, this focus is key."

Normalisation Phenomenon Throughout Europe

While the research was centered around Germany, this normalisation effect is probable to apply to countries throughout the European continent.

"This is frequently observed in German and British media," explained another researcher. "The far right makes a statement and everyone begins discussing it for several days."

"Although you're countering it, you're repeating it," he added.

Hardening of Political Rhetoric

At certain points, political figures have also hardened their language to match that of the radical right.

In a recent discussion, a former German chancellor called for large-scale deportations and urged them to happen "more often and faster."

Comparable examples can be found throughout the continent, as elected officials from nations ranging from the UK to the French Republic adopt the rhetoric of the far right, especially on immigration.

This has created an feedback loop that would have been unthinkable a decade ago.

Core Problem: Who Sets the Agenda?

"{If you're a moderate political group and you are talking about cultural issues – immigration, assimilation – in a way that is determined by the rhythm of the far right, that's the essence of agenda setting," clarified a researcher.

Other parties have taken additional measures, attempting to emulate the strict platform of the radical right, even as studies suggests that doing so drives voters to vote for the far right.

Gradual Influence and Public Perception

The scope of information gathered showed that the influence of far-right groups had been gradual and had grown with the passage of time.

"Voter awareness doesn't change from day to day," stated a co-author. "But if you encounter this pessimistic narrative around migration every second week, and it is being spread not only by radical groups but also, for instance, by mainstream political organizations, then of course this narrative travels further."

Requirement for Mainstream Parties to Develop Their Own Narratives

The study emphasized the necessity for mainstream parties to develop their distinct discourses, particularly on topics such as migration and assimilation, instead of continuously following the far right.

"It resembles a choreography," explained one researcher. "If the conductor is far-right and you're responding to them, you lose the ability to choose which tune should be heard."