🔗 Share this article

Internationally, governments are pouring massive amounts into what is known as “sovereign AI” – developing national AI systems. From Singapore to the nation of Malaysia and the Swiss Confederation, nations are racing to develop AI that comprehends local languages and local customs.

The International AI Competition

This initiative is a component of a larger global competition spearheaded by tech giants from the America and China. Whereas organizations like OpenAI and a social media giant invest substantial funds, developing countries are also placing sovereign investments in the AI landscape.

However with such vast sums at stake, is it possible for smaller countries attain notable benefits? As stated by a analyst from a well-known thinktank, If not you’re a affluent state or a large firm, it’s quite a hardship to develop an LLM from the ground up.”

Defence Considerations

Many countries are reluctant to rely on overseas AI technologies. Throughout the Indian subcontinent, for instance, Western-developed AI solutions have occasionally fallen short. An illustrative example featured an AI agent used to instruct learners in a distant community – it spoke in the English language with a pronounced Western inflection that was hard to understand for local students.

Additionally there’s the national security factor. For India’s military authorities, using specific foreign AI tools is viewed unacceptable. According to a founder explained, There might be some unvetted training dataset that could claim that, oh, a certain region is outside of India … Utilizing that specific model in a security environment is a big no-no.”

He added, I’ve consulted people who are in defence. They aim to use AI, but, setting aside certain models, they prefer not to rely on US technologies because information might go overseas, and that is absolutely not OK with them.”

National Efforts

In response, several countries are supporting national projects. One such effort is underway in India, in which a firm is attempting to develop a domestic LLM with public funding. This project has dedicated approximately 1.25 billion dollars to AI development.

The expert imagines a AI that is less resource-intensive than top-tier systems from US and Chinese tech companies. He states that the country will have to make up for the financial disparity with expertise. Based in India, we don’t have the luxury of pouring billions of dollars into it,” he says. “How do we contend versus such as the enormous investments that the US is investing? I think that is where the core expertise and the brain game comes in.”

Native Focus

Across Singapore, a government initiative is supporting AI systems trained in the region's native tongues. Such tongues – including Malay, Thai, Lao, Indonesian, the Khmer language and more – are often inadequately covered in Western-developed LLMs.

It is my desire that the individuals who are developing these sovereign AI tools were aware of the extent to which and how quickly the leading edge is progressing.

A leader involved in the program notes that these tools are designed to complement bigger systems, as opposed to substituting them. Platforms such as ChatGPT and another major AI system, he comments, frequently have difficulty with local dialects and local customs – interacting in unnatural Khmer, for instance, or proposing non-vegetarian meals to Malay users.

Creating local-language LLMs enables state agencies to incorporate local context – and at least be “smart consumers” of a powerful system built elsewhere.

He continues, I am prudent with the word national. I think what we’re aiming to convey is we aim to be better represented and we want to understand the capabilities” of AI systems.

International Partnership

For countries trying to carve out a role in an escalating international arena, there’s a different approach: collaborate. Experts associated with a well-known institution put forward a state-owned AI venture distributed among a consortium of emerging nations.

They call the initiative “a collaborative AI effort”, in reference to Europe’s effective play to create a alternative to a major aerospace firm in the mid-20th century. The plan would entail the formation of a government-supported AI organization that would merge the capabilities of different states’ AI initiatives – such as the UK, Spain, Canada, the Federal Republic of Germany, Japan, the Republic of Singapore, South Korea, the French Republic, the Swiss Confederation and Sweden – to establish a viable alternative to the US and Chinese major players.

The primary researcher of a report outlining the initiative states that the concept has attracted the interest of AI officials of at least a few states up to now, in addition to multiple sovereign AI firms. Although it is currently targeting “middle powers”, less wealthy nations – the nation of Mongolia and the Republic of Rwanda for example – have additionally expressed interest.

He comments, “Nowadays, I think it’s simply reality there’s diminished faith in the promises of the existing White House. Experts are questioning like, should we trust any of this tech? What if they decide to